Throat Clearing Phrases
New law students often find themselves writing long, introductory phrases at the beginning of a sentence, as if legal writing required wordiness or a false sense of importance. These unnecessary phrases often are called "throat-clearing phrases." Edit them out of your work. Remember that clarity and conciseness are the two most important goals of legal writing, and that throat-clearing phrases contribute to neither of these goals. Instead of getting the reader to the point, they delay the reader's arrival and hide the message.Undesirable:
It is important to remember that in our legal system the jury must convict only upon evidence that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Better: The jury must convict only upon evidence that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Undesirable:
The Petitioner contends in this Court that Respondent's actions violate the First Amendment.
Better: The Respondent's actions violate the First Amendment.
Undesirable:
A key aspect of this case, which must not be overlooked, is that the plaintiff is not a member of the class intended to be protected by this statute.
Better: The plaintiff is not a member of the class intended to be protected by this statute.
to your browser to complete the exercise.