Chicago-Kent College of Law:  Home Page





PRESS RELEASE

For more information, please contact: Gwen Osborne, director of public affairs, (312) 906-5251

Chicago-Kent and Lawyer's Committee for Better Housing study finds eviction court inattentive to procedural requirements and tenants' dignity


CHICAGO-December 18, 2003---With an average duration of 1 minute and 44 seconds per case, hundreds of eviction court hearings monitored by Chicago law students frequently failed to require landlords to meet their statutory burden of proof; rarely, if ever, afforded tenants the opportunity to state a defense to the landlord's claims; and, at times, overlooked other due process requirements.

Chicago-Kent Honors Scholars authored the eviction court study. Shown (L-R) Wenfeng Li, John Guzzardo, Karen Doran, Ryan Liebl. Not shown: Kevin Hill, Neal Kitterlin.
According to a study conducted by Chicago-Kent College of Law and co-sponsored by the Lawyer's Committee for Better Housing, the court's lack of attention to procedural requirements, while usually not subverting justice, harms the dignity of tenants and often sends them away with little to no understanding of the judgments against them.

During the fall of 2002, six Chicago-Kent students, all of them members of the law school's Honors Scholar program, monitored 763 cases in Chicago's eviction court. They found that in only eight percent of the monitored cases were parties sworn in before giving testimony, and in only 65 percent of cases did the judge examine the written notice given by the landlord to the tenant as required by the Illinois Forcible Entry and Detainer Act.

Although judges frequently asked tenants whether they had paid the rent, in only 27 percent of the cases monitored did judges ask tenants if they had a defense. When asked for a defense, the tenant presented one about 55 percent of the time. However, when not asked, the tenant presented a defense only nine percent of the time.

While the reasons offered by tenants for nonpayment of rent were rarely sufficient to avoid eviction, asking tenants if they have a defense "reinforce[s] the legitimacy of the process," says the report. "Although many defendants may have little to contribute to their own defense beyond an explanation for their inability to pay, the dignitary harm inflicted on the defendant by such a style is substantial. Often, the defendant does not grasp the nature of the proceedings or even the meaning of the outcome," the report says.

The report stresses the need for tenant education before eviction cases even get to court. The data showed that a small but significant number of tenants could have asserted effective defenses based on substandard living conditions had they understood the required procedures. "One of the recurrent tragedies monitors witnessed was tenants being evicted from shockingly substandard housing, often documented with photos brought to court, whose attempted defenses failed because they did not know that they were required to provide notice of their intent to partially withhold and that they should not withhold all of their rent," says the report.

The report recommends that, to help tenants raise habitability defenses, the law require landlords to include language in their five-day notices that explains the procedure for withholding rent. The report also recommends that tenant rights advocates conduct public service advertising campaigns to reach out to low-income tenants before a five-day notice is served, telling them that they have a right to habitable housing and directing them to information sources where they can learn how to enforce their rights.

"[F]or the system to work, it must at least be possible for defendants to prevail, and where they don't, it must treat them with the dignity and respect owed to those facing one of life's most devastating losses: the loss of one's home," says the report.

Chicago-Kent Honors Scholars, the authors of the report, are scholarship students with records of high achievement in academics and leadership. "I am delighted by the initiative demonstrated by our students," said Chicago-Kent Dean Harold J. Krent. "They learned a great deal through the study, and I hope that their results can provide impetus for overdue reform."

Copies of the study are available from Gwen Osborne, director of public affairs, Chicago-Kent College of Law, (312) 906-5251 or gosborne@kentlaw.edu.

# # #

NEWS & EVENTS LINKS

  Webmail Login              Updated July 13, 2004    Office of Public Affairs     Contact Us