Circuit Court of Cook County

Law Division

___________________________

Vivian Schmitter, Plaintiff

versus

Michael W. Gutting, Defendant

___________________________

Complaint(1)

  1. Plaintiff Vivian Schmitter is a resident of Chicago, Illinois.
  2. Defendant Michael W. Gutting is a resident of Chicago, Illinois.
  3. Defendant has a high-end, state-of-the-art "notebook" computer.
  4. Plaintiff needs this computer to improve the efficiency of her legal studies.
  5. Wherefore, Plaintiff asks this court to issue a judgment that Plaintiff is entitled to said computer or money in an amount sufficient to enable her to buy one just like it..

Complaint(2)

  1. Plaintiff Vivian Schmitter is a resident of Chicago, Illinois.
  2. Defendant Michael W. Gutting is a resident of Chicago, Illinois.
  3. Defendant contracted to convey his "notebook" computer to Plaintiff.
  4. Defendant has not performed the contract.
  5. Wherefore, Plaintiff asks this court to issue a judgment that Plaintiff is entitled to said computer or money in an amount sufficient to enable her to buy one just like it..

Complaint(3)

  1. Plaintiff Vivian Schmitter is a resident of Chicago, Illinois.
  2. Defendant Michael W. Gutting is a resident of Chicago, Illinois.
  3. Defendant is a 2L law student at Chicago-Kent.
  4. On 14 September 2004, at 9:46 AM, in a conversation in the first-floor atrium of said law school, Defendant told his classmate Dawn M. Rose, I certainly hope I ace the exam in Civil Procedure. I'm probably going to fill up my hard drive with all the notes on all the hypotheticals."
  5. Ms. Rose shrugged and walked away, saying "I'm late for class."
  6. On 15 April 2004, at 3:06 PM, in a conversation in the 5th floor elevator lobby of 565 West Adams Street, Defendant said to Plaintiff, "As soon as I finish this semester, I'm going to get a new computer and you might as well have this one.".
  7. Plaintiff responded, "Oh! Thank you very much."
  8. Defendant is now in the Fall Semester.
  9. Defendant sits on the front row on the aisle in Civil Procedure class.
  10. On June 15, 2004, in a conversation conducted by telephone at 9:02 PM, Defendant told his classmate Daniel M. Finer, "I've decided not to spend the money on a new computer."
  11. Wherefore, Plaintiff asks this court to issue a judgment that Plaintiff is entitled to said computer or money in an amount sufficient to enable her to buy one just like it..