Conceptual approaches to judicial review of homeowners association decisions

1. Is it within the authority given the decisionmaker by the condo declaration? If not; it's void

2. Is it "reasonable?"

(a) Are decisions to adopt new rules supported by:

(i) legitimate interests, and

(ii) logic?

(b) Are factual decisions backed by appropriate evidence?

(c) Does the decision contravene superior sources of law-- administrative agency rules, statutes, or state or federal constitutional provisions?